Washington State UniversityWorld Class. Face to Face.Future StudentsCampusesWSU HomeWSU Search
Agricultural Horizons - Agricultural Sustainability Notes Series    
       

 

 

Using Fire as a Management Tool

FOR CROP PRODUCTION IN EASTERN WASHINGTON

Roland Schirman - Columbia Co/WSU Extension

Producers in eastern Washington have tried many approaches to maximize their conservation efforts to provide the greatest protection of natural resources yet remain economically viable. One of the tools that has been used, but is often misunderstood by the non-farming public, is fire to manage crop residue and associated problems.

Used selectively, fire can be an effective tool for managing residue and combating diseases, insects and weeds, and be an environmentally sound Best Management Practice. Land managers across the West have found the use of fire, as a selectively applied site-specific process, to be an important tool in protecting the health of the land. The Nature Conservancy--which uses fire to protect its prairie lands from degradation--and the National Forest Service are but two examples. The same is true of agriculture in its application of stewardship of available resources.

Land managers utilize many basic biological and physical factors when choosing use of fire over alternative production tools. Several of these include:

RESIDUE MANAGEMENT/WATER CONSERVATION

The majority of crop production acres in eastern Washington are dependent on naturally occurring precipitation. To optimize the precipitation that does occur, producers must intercept and hold the moisture where it falls, minimize evaporative loss and carefully select other cropping practices to have moisture available at critical growth stages of crop development.

When fire is properly used as a component of "holistic" production systems, mechanical tillage operations are reduced significantly, field operations are performed in a more timely manner, formation of soil compaction layers are minimized, water infiltration into the soil is enhanced and plants can more effectively use the available root zone moisture. Cropping systems that integrate fire in spring crop management plans provide additional benefits afforded by the ability of growers to leave standing stubble during the winter period that reduces snow drifting and surface evaporation. Without the use of the spring burn, fall tillage is required to enable timely spring planting and must be coupled with excessive numbers of tillage operations to prepare the ground for planting. Both of these latter items reduce efficiencies of water management.

RESIDUE MANAGEMENT/SOIL ERODEABILITY

Nearly every farm in eastern Washington has highly erodible land. Control of erosion to preserve farmland productivity has been an ongoing struggle since this area was first settled.

During the past 25 years great effort has been expended in an attempt to develop an economically feasible crop production system for eastern Washington that allows direct seeding of crops(sometimes referred to as no-till). One of the identified limitations is the ability to penetrate the residue and create a suitable micro environment for timely germination and emergence of the crop when crop aftermath exceeds several tons per acre. With the use of fire, producers have been able to implement a direct seeding/low till systems.

Compared to intensive tillage the benefits of these systems are measured in:

  • Greater soil aggregate stability,
  • Reduced microbial oxidation of root and associated organic materials,
  • Improved water infiltration with better retention of soil macro pores,
  • Retention of intact plant crowns giving improved soil holding capability,
  • Improved seed germination of spring crops with higher soil temperatures
  • Timely nutrient cycling in relation to crop needs.

PEST MANAGEMENT

Disease, insect and weed pests are biological opportunists that can become economically devastating in cropping systems that use only limited management options. Unmanaged, these pests can proliferate to economic loss levels that render the cropping system totally unprofitable. A producer must interrupt the life cycle of a pest to prevent escalation of the problem in continuing years.

Three of the most severe examples discussed below have caused millions of dollars in losses to dryland cereal gain producers alone in the Pacific Northwest. In each situation discussed, the absence of fire as a management tool is documented to have increased the economic losses from these biological pests. It must be remembered that pest management is an integrated process with many facets. Fire as a tool must be a carefully planned component of any management system.

Cephalosporium stripe, a fungal disease that prevents nutrient movement to developing winter wheat heads by clogging vascular tissues, produces infectious spores that remain viable primarily on the above ground portions of infected plant residue. Spores on infected residues remain viable for a number of years and can infect new seedings of winter wheat through root systems and kill developing tillers. Management of this disease is further complicated by the lack of registered fungicides for control and difficulty experienced by plant scientists to develop plant resistance to this complex disease. Reduction of crop residue with fire when integrated with other pest management practices such as spring cropping and/or the use of alternative crops has proven successful in lessening the occurrence of this disease. Without the use of fire as a management tool, producers are left with planting more years of non-susceptible crops with lower economic potentials or using excessive tillage before the next winter wheat crop to reduce inoculum by "destroying" the host residues. The latter is extremely devastating to soil conservation and soil quality enhancements.

Hessian fly, a major insect problem in wheat producing regions of the USA, was not a serious threat to Pacific Northwest wheat production under systems which utilized intensive mechanical tillage. Tillage which destroyed or buried residue, also destroyed or buried the overwintering pupae stage of Hessian fly which could in turn infect subsequent winter or spring wheat crops. However, with the implementation of soil conserving - high residue management systems, the overwintering pupae stage of Hessian fly was left unharmed and began to build to economic damaging levels in the overwintering straw. This was very apparent in the early 1990s in the Pacific Northwest, as growers implemented requirements of the USDA Food Security Act which was initiated 1985. In contrast to Cephalosporium stripe, some suppression can be obtained with selected insecticides or resistant varieties; however, the added cost and or lower yield performance of these varieties places the growers at an economic disadvantage. Integration of fire as a management tool help minimize the economic impact of Hessian fly is considered a component of Integrated Pest Management systems utilized to combat this serious insect pest.

Weeds are undoubtedly the most visual example, regardless of cropping system, of how shifts in management practices cause variations in ecological adaptations of different weed pests. Each weed has slightly different ecological requirements and it is the producers duty to understand the management of the "weed seed bank" of each field. Jointed goatgrass has become one of the most severe grass weed species problems in winter wheat cropping systems infesting over one million acres in the Pacific North West alone. Jointed goatgrass reproduces only by seed, but seed can remain viable in the soil for up to five years. There are currently no herbicides available that will control this weed selectively in winter wheat. Timely burning of stubble after winter wheat harvest kills about 90% of the seed in jointed goatgrass spikelets laying on the soil. In the absence of fire as a management tool, the recommended management practices to manage the weed seed bank is not growing winter wheat or other winter cereal crops for three to five years. Historically spring wheat has yielded about two-thirds the grain as winter wheat placing farmers at a distinct economic disadvantage when more multiple years of spring crops are grown.

INDIRECT SAVINGS

Since the replacement of animal power with petroleum power in farming operations, agriculture has become a major "consumer" of non-renewable energy reserves. Fire as a management tool saves an average of three tillage operations, most of which are power intensive and high users of non-renewable energy resources. Repair and maintenance on equipment is also greatly reduced providing further conservation of natural resources.

SUMMARY

Fire has a proven history as a "natural" and integral component of biological cropping systems for centuries. Research scientists and producers continue to recognize the importance of this "tool" in current cropping systems and how it needs to be retained as a selective use option as we enter the Twenty-first Century. Availability of all cropping tools as components of a "holistic" agricultural system is critical to the long-term survival of agriculture. More importantly, we must develop systems that are truly environmentally designed to protect our most important natural resource -- the soil.

Editorial note: The use of burn-notill became a NRCS approved practice in 1997. It was socially unacceptable to the opponents of agricultural burning. A lawsuit ensued and the practice was discontinued as a NRCS approved BMP. Ed Adams

Agricultural Sustainability. Highlights from a seminar series conducted by Washington State University's Ag Horizons Team and funded by USDA Western Region SARE.

Ed Adams
668 North Riverpoint Blvd. Box B
Spokane, WA 99202-1662
Phone: (509) 358-7960
FAX: (509) 358-7900
e-mailadamse@wsu.edu

 
                         
 
Contact us: Ag Horizons 509-725-4171 | Accessibility | Copyright | Policies
Ag Horizons, PO Box 399, Davenport, WA, 99122 USA