|
Hosts
Hosts are oats, barley, and wheat in order of relative disease
occurrence.
Symptoms and Signs
Diseased heads emerge from the boot a few days earlier than healthy
heads and are replaced with black, powdery masses of smut teliospores
(Photo 8). These masses are first enclosed by remnants of the
cereal pericarp. However, this covering soon disintegrates to
release the teliospores. In barley, infected plants may be slightly
taller than healthy plants.
Disease Cycle
The fungus over-winters as dormant mycelium in infected grain.
Infected seeds germinate normally, but the mycelium grows along
with the growing point of the plant until it reaches the head.
In the kernels it transforms into masses of teliospores. The
teliospores are windborne to the open flowers of a respective
host plant. Cultivars that have more open flowers or a longer
flowering period are more susceptible.
The teliospores germinate but produce no basidiospores. Instead,
dikaryotic (binuclear) hyphae form and penetrate through the
ovary wall or possibly the stigma to establish in the embryo
(seed infection). Temperatures of 61 to 72F and moisture from
dew or light rains favor both teliospore germination and infection.
Semiloose smut differs in its disease cycle, in that seeds carry
the teliospores and infection takes place after seed germination
(seedling infection).
Control
Chemical. Before the development of systemic
fungicides, the only effective treatment consisted of heating
the grain seed in water at 130F for 10 minutes before planting.
Now carboxin seed treatment is the most important control method.
Its use has eliminated this cumbersome procedure.
Cultural. Plant only seed certified to be smut
free.
Resistance. Some cultivars are more resistant
or are less susceptible than others, but it is not always convenient
or profitable to grow them.
References
Loria, R., M.V. Wiese, and A.L. Jones. 1982. Effect of free moisture,
head development, and embryo accessibility on infection of wheat
by Ustilago tritici. Phytopathology 72: 1270-1272.
Thomas, P.L. 1981. Distinguishing between the loose smuts
of barley. Plant Disease 65:834.
Other Interesting Loose
Smut sites:
UC Pest Management Guidelines, SMALL
GRAINS LOOSE SMUT -- descripttion and pictures.
Wheat
Diseases * Barley
Diseases
WSU
Home Page * Small
Grains Home * Grow Serve
Edited and reviewed by Ed Adams, WSU Extension Plant Pathologist
Comments and questions: adamse@wsu.edu
Copyright ©
Washington State University | Disclaimer
Electronic
Publishing and Appropriate Use Policy
University Information: 509/335-3564
 |